Hurt on the job while hooping? Might be a Workers Comp case. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

Great decision out of the First District Appellate Court last year on an interesting Workers Comp issue. In Calumet Sch. Dist #132 v Ill. Workers’ Comp. Comm , Jonathan Jordan[ironic this guy was named Jordan] was a science teacher at Calumet Middle School. Teachers at that that school were expected to attend and participate in afterschool activities which involved student participation. Jordan’s principal told him about an afterschool basketball program that the school ran in order to reward students who were performing well and staying out of trouble. Students were allowed to play in games against the teachers. Although Jordan thought the basketball games were a great idea he was reluctant to play for fear of injury. Additionally, Jordan was not a basketball player.

The principal first told Jordan about the basketball games a few weeks before Jordan agreed to play. Jordan did not agree to play and did not give any commitment to playing in the future. The principal asked Jordan again. Jordan was was again non-committal suggesting “….maybe another time.” Jordan was hoping the principal would take a hint and stop asking. No such luck. The principal asked Jordan a third time to play and Jordan agreed. You can probably guess where this is going…..

Before getting to the game though, a couple of important facts. At the time the principal was after Jordan to play, Jordan had not yet received a contract to teach the following year. He also had not received his annual review. Jordan was concerned his repeated refusals to play might hurt his review or impact the decision to renew his contract. Although he was not ordered to play, Jordan did feel some pressure to participate in the games.

While playing, Jordan attempted a jump shot but fell awkwardly onto his left arm. He suffered a serious fracture which required internal fixation surgery. He then filed his Workers’ Compensation case.

At trial, the school district asserted that Jordan was involved in a “voluntary recreation activity” – and, thereby precluded from making a Workers Compensation recovery. The arbitrator, to her credit, didn’t buy that and found for Jordan. The School District appealed the arbitrator’s decision to the Commission but were shot down. The School District then took the case to the Circuit Court of Cook County. The court determined Jordan was involved in a “voluntary recreation program” and barred from recovery.

Jordan’s lawyer, a good guy and good lawyer by the name of Evan Hughes[in the interest of full disclosure Evan is a friend, and former suitemate of mine] wasn’t having it. He appealed the Court’s decision to the First District Appellate Court. Evan’s brief must have been very persuasive. Because the Appellate Court swatted the School District’s arguments away just like Dikembe Mutombo swatted away all those shots in the NBA. The Appellate Court emphasized that Jordan was not a basketball player and had repeatedly declined invitations to play. The Court also wisely noted that Jordan was justified to feel some pressure as his contract had not yet been renewed, nor had had annual review been completed. The Appellate Court concluded that Jordan did not participate in the game for his own enjoyment – and was thus not involved in a “voluntary recreational program”. Well done Evan!

Again, appropriate of nothing, I have some video of a guy who, unlike Jordan, did think he could play. Phillip Seymour Hoffman in Along Came Polly a marginal movie from a couple years ago. Hoffman however, was great – as he was in everything. Hearing him yell “White Chocolate” on a ill-conceived drive to the hoop justifies spending 30 seconds of your life watching this video.

Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Movie poster for
September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.