Experts dispute victim numbers in Uber Sexual Assault Trial. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

Rideshare giant Uber is currently on trial in California in a bellwether trial involving hundreds of accusers claiming various levels of sexual assault from Uber drivers over the last several years.

Lawyers for the victims argued at the start of the trial that Uber vastly underreported incidents of sexual assault and misconduct and that Uber puts growth and profits over passenger safety. Natalie Weatherford, one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers told jurors that from 2017 to 2022, Uber reported just over 12,000 total incidents from five separate categories of “serious sexual assault” – a term apparently coined by Uber and its lawyers. Weatherford told the jury that when additional categories were included the reported incidents actually exceed 300,000.

Last week Victoria Stodden, an associate professor from USC took the stand as a statistics expert for Uber. Stodden told the jury that David Madigan Phd, plaintiffs expert, had grouped all the incidents into one category – “Sexual Malfeasance”. Stodden however, took a different approach where she broke the reported incidents down into a less serious behavior. And in her analysis, she found that two specific categories – Comments & Gestures – made up most of the reported incidents. “The category around comments and gestures, [and] and the category around leering, its about 70% of the incidents.”

Stodden broke her analysis down further by saying that it included flirting, personal questions, comments on the passenger’s appearance as well as staring/leering. On cross examination, Stodden was forced to admit that she didn’t know that precise % of the reported incidents fell into categories that Uber considered “most serious” but guessed that the number was under 30%. Curious that Uber’s expert would not know the % of “most serious” reports as that would seem to be an important fact for an expert to know. And despite Stodden’s attempt to soften most of the incidents as inappropriate comments and flirting, she had to acknowledge that that nearly one third of the reported incidents were serious.

And Stoddard was forced to acknowledge that in 2017-18 there were 5,980 serious incidents; 3,824 in 2019-20 and 2717 in 2021-22. No statistical slight of hand can soften those numbers, which translate to over 4000 sexual assaults over that three year period. Those numbers will be difficult to explain away for Uber.

Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Movie poster for
September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.