Topgolf hit with $15 million dollar verdict after 9 year old suffers devastating injuries. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

Last week in Oregon, a federal jury walloped Topgolf with a $15 million dollar verdict after a child suffered devastating skull injuries after being struck with a golf club.

Topgolf first appeared on the golf scene about 20 years ago in England, offering a modern twist on the traditionally drab driving range. Topgolf facilities are part driving range, part entertainment complex, with full food and beverage menus, climate-controlled hitting bays and live music – all in a sports bar environment.

The lawsuit grew out of a November, 2021 incident at a TopGolf facility in Oregon. The nine year old child was attending a birthday party as the facility. Surveillance footage showed children from the birthday party moving about in areas designated for golfing – or “hitting areas”. Several children were seen tossing golf balls onto the driving range. The injured child then moved past a red safety line in place to keep guests clear of players swing golf clubs. As another boy prepared to hit a golf ball the child moved behind him, directly into the path of the club. The child was then struck in the forehead by the golf club.

As a result of the impact, the child suffered an open, depressed skull fracture, an orbital fracture, a traumatic brain injury and a cerebral hemorrhage. Emergency neurosurgery was required, which included the placement of three titanium plates in the child’s head. The lawsuit alleged that as as result of the injuries, the child suffers chronic headaches as well as behavioral changes.

The complaint alleged that Topgolf failed to provide the required tour and safety talk before the party. The safety talk included specific instructions to stay well behind the red line when players golfers are swinging clubs.

At trial, testimony was presented that Topgolf had been aware of similar incidents for several years. As early as 2013, a safety consultant had warned that guests were at risk of being struck by golf clubs and recommended installation of barriers – that Topgolf elected not to install. At trial, Topgolf claimed that in addition to the red warning lines, there were warning signs in place as well as recurring announcements to stay clear of the area. And Topgolf also pointed the finger at the hosts of the party, claiming they had responsibility to supervise the kids.

The jury disregarded the defense arguments and found Topgolf 97% responsible for the child’s injuries. Topgolf also faced punitive damages exposure but wisely settled that component of the plaintiff’s case after the verdict.

Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Movie poster for
September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.