SUPREME COURT DOES THE RIGHT THING - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court upheld a multi-million dollar Vermont verdict, and in doing so preserved an important right for consumers – the right to sue drug manufacturers for injuries caused by defective drugs. The case that started it all began in Vermont in the year 2000, when Diana Levine[shown below] went to a clinic near her home complaining of a severe headache. She was given Demerol and an injection of Phenergan. The drug is usually given orally or through an IV drip. What Ms. Levine did not know was that there could be devastating side effects if the drug reached an artery. The maker of the drug, Wyeth, was however, fully aware of that fact. At least 20 other person had lost limbs as a result of the being given the drug prior to Levine.
Shortly after being given the injection[which apparently reached an artery]gangrene developed and Ms. Levine lost her right hand. Then she lost part of her right arm. She sued and settled against the clinic. She then brought suit against Wyeth for failing to warn consumers of the dangers presented by the drug. A Vermont jury agreed, and awarded her $6.7 million dollars.
Wyeth appealed, arguing that it had disclosed the risks to the Food and Drug Administration[FDA]which went ahead and approved the warning label. Wyeth argued that the FDA approval preempted the right of Ms. Levine to sue. Wyeth’s preemption argument was made possible by the recently departed Bush administration. Three years ago Bush and his co-horts reversed a long-standing FDA policy by announcing that FDA approval of a drug barred any suit against the manufacturer.
The Supreme Court however, shot the Bush preemption doctrine down. The opinion noted that Congress had regulated drugs for many years and had never barred consumers from suing drug manufacturers. In addition, the Court also noted that lawsuits like those filed by Ms. Levine exposed dangerous drugs – thereby making the market safer.
Every consumer should thank Ms. Levine for staying the course these nine long years. If the case had gone the other way, tens of thousands of consumers pursuing cases in the courts for injuries suffered because of defective drugs would have been out of luck.

Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Movie poster for
September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.