More email nightmares... - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

As first reported in the ABA Journal[online] a story broke yesterday about some unfortunate emails that surfaced in a legal billing dispute between DLA Piper[DLA] and a former client. DLA had been retained by energy entrepreneur Adam H. Victor[the formidable-looking man pictured above] to prepare a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy filing for Project Orange Associates, one of Victor’s companies. DLA got to work. And DLA subsequently sent Victor a substantial bill. Victor refused to pay and DLA promptly sued him for $675,000. Victor decided to fire back and filed a countercomplaint, in which he alleged that DLA substantially overbilled him. Additionally, Victor obtained over 250,000 documents in discovery, some of which contained some very unfortunate commentary by some DLA lawyers pertaining to the growing bill.

DLA partner Erich P Eisenengger noted in one email that “I hear we are already 200K over our estimate – that’s Team DLA Piper!” In another email string, DLA attorney Christopher Thomson chimed in after learning that some lawyer named Vince had been added to the Project Orange bankruptcy team: “Now Vince has some random people working full time on random research projects in standard “churn that bill, baby!” mode”. Thomson noted that “That bill shall know no limits”.

Both Eisenegger and Thomson have since left DLA and declined to comment when contacted.

DLA may claim the emails were simply off-handed comments meant as a joke. Victor at this point however, appears not to see the humor. Victor’s attorney, Larry Hutcher recently amended the counterclaim against DLA last week, adding a fraud claim and requesting $22.5 million in punitive damages.

Good rule of thumb – always assume a client and/or jury will eventually evaluate your emails.

Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Movie poster for
September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.