Did Jerry Reinsdorf and Jim Thompson try to silence ISFA CEO? - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

Ben Javorsky, of the Chicago Reader wrote a really interesting article last week about a lawsuit recently filed against former Governor James Thompson and current White Sox owner Jerry Reinsdorf. The plaintiff, Perri Irmer, is alleging that the two men colluded to have her fired from her job as CEO of the Illinois Sports Facility Authority[“ISFA”]. The IFSA, founded in 1987, is a governmental entity that oversees the renovation and construction of sports facilities for Illinois professional sports teams.

As Javorsky notes in his article, back in the mid-80’s, Reinsdorf was making noise about moving the Sox to Tampa Bay unless the City agreed to build a new stadium to replace aging Comiskey Park. At the time, Jim Thompson was Governor and Harold Washington was Mayor of the City of Chicago. Neither one of them were anxious to be remembered as the politicians who allowed the Sox to flee south. So the pols got together and not long thereafter a stadium deal was muscled through the General Assembly. According to the Javorsky article, Illinois taxpayers financed the construction of a new stadium for the White Sox, now known as The Cell. The legislation called for 100% public financing of the new stadium. Construction was started in 1989 and The Cell opened in 1991. IFSA was designated as the owner and operator of the stadium – but the White Sox collected most of the revenue generated at ball games. That was the arrangement for nearly 20 years and no one made any noise.

In 2004, Perri Irmer was named CEO of the ISFA. A couple of years later, she started to make some noise. In 2008, through Irmer’s efforts, the ISFA persuaded the White Sox to start paying rent [$1.2 million a year] for use of the park. Additionally, Irmer was backing development of a restaurant and related shops across from the ballpark – which would generate additional funds that would be earmarked for the State. But that never happened. Instead, in 2011, “Bacardi at the Park” an upscale restaurant opened up right across from The Cell. Construction of the restaurant itself cost about $3.2 million, while infrastructure upgrades were another $3.7 million. Once again, that $6.9 million was paid by Illinois taxpayers. But the State gets NONE of the profits from Bacardi at The Park. According to most reports, Governor Thompson signed off on those details back in the 80’s when the original legislation was being cobbled together. When all this came to light recently, local media asked Governor Thompson to explain how anyone who allegedly was representing the interests of Illinois taxpayers, could ever sign off on such a one-sided deal. Thompson replied, “We said to Jerry, “Jerry, can we have part of the profits?” And he said no. We said, Ok. I’ve known Jerry for 52 years. He’s tough. He’s tough.” Oh. Okay then. That explains it. Wonder if he teaches those fierce negotiating techniques to new lawyers at Winston & Strawn?

Getting back to the lawsuit, the suit alleges that Reinsdorf, unhappy with having to pay rent, then lobbied former Governor Rod Blagojevich to dump Irmer from ISFA. And, the suit alleges, in December of 2008, a top Blagojevich aid told Irmer that Reinsdorf was unhappy and Irmer was road kill. The suit also alleges however, that Irmer was told that if she played nice and “resigned” there would be a cushy job for her in the private sector. But Blago got indicted and had other things on his plate. So the ISFA renewed Irmer’s contract.

Flash forward to 2011. The suit alleges Perri showed up at work one day and discovered she was locked out of her office. Thompson was waiting for her, and summoned her into a conference room where he told her she could resign or be fired. Additionally, he allegedly told her that if she didn’t resign, and forced the ISFA Board to fire her, her reputation would be “ruined”. Irmer refused to resign. Two day later she was fired. The lawsuit alleges that Irmer was fired because the powers that be wanted her quiet and didn’t appreciate her efforts to protect Illinois taxpayers.

Thompson won’t comment and Reinsdorf says the suit has no merit. We’ll see. Irmer is represented by Carmen Caruso and Linda Chatman.

Lastly…interesting piece of trivia….guess who threw out the first pitch at the Grand Opening of The Cell in 1991? Answer: Jim Thompson.

Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Movie poster for
September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.