EEOC obtains $240 million dollar verdict for abused workers. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

Every time you tell yourself you have seen the last of these stories…

An Iowa City, Iowa jury awarded a record $241 million dollars to a group of 32 workers who had been systematically abused for decades by a Texas employer. The employer, Hill County Farms, d/b/a Henry’s Turkey Service, is based in Goldthwaite, Texas. The work and abuse however, took place in rural Iowa. The workers lived in a bunkhouse in Muscatine County, Iowa. They worked at at Henry’s Turkey Service, a turkey processing plant in a nearby Iowa town. What makes this story particularly horrible is that each of the workers suffered some form of mental disability. The picture above shows a few of the workers who lived in the Iowa bunkhouse [Photo courtesy of the Desmoines Register].

Back in the 1970’s, Texas officials promoted Henry’s as a company that would provide training to the mentally challenged. Henry’s sent hundreds of men to live in labor camps in Iowa and other locations over the years. But the conditions under which the workers lived were often deplorable. The Iowa bunkhouse was overrun with cockroaches and mice. Windows didn’t function. The only heat came for sporadic placement of water heaters. After receiving complaints from relatives in 2009, the State of Iowas inspected the bunkhouse, found it to be a fire hazard and declared it uninhabitable.

And things didn’t get any better for the workers once they got to the plant. The EEOC presented disturbing evidence that Henry’s personnel exploited the workers because their mental disabilities precluded them from fully understanding what was happening. The abuse, which had taken place for years, was both verbal and physical. Workers were struck, kicked and sometimes handcuffed. Supervisors who were supposed to act as guardians, dismissed complaints of pain or injury.

Henry’s personnel even stole the workers’ money. They improperly deducted monies from the workers’ paychecks and Social Security benefits in order to pay for the cost of their care. Ultimately the workers received only $65 a month for grueling work under ghastly conditions. The equivalent of .41 cents an hour.

At the conclusion of the case, the jury agreed that Henry’s had subjected the men to severe abuse and discrimination between 2007 and 2009. The jury awarded each of the men $2 million in punitive damages and $5.5 million in compensatory damages. In September, 2012, the judge had ruled that Henry’s was to pay $1.3 million for disability-based wage discrimination. The total judgement ends up at $241.3 million.

Henry’s is now a defunct company and it is unlikely the full verdict will ever be paid. But the company still owns significant real estate in Texas and the government has its eyes on that land.

Congratulations to EEOC attorney Robert Canino who did great work on behalf of the workers.

By Mark Loftus February 17, 2026
German Conglomerate makes a bid to end Roundup litigation 
By Mark Loftus February 17, 2026
By Mark Loftus February 3, 2026
THE ILLINOIS GENDER VIOLENCE ACT - IN A NUTSHELL Under the Illinois Gender Violence Act (GVA) 740 IlCS 82/1, victims of sexual assault, domestic violence and other forms of gender related violence can bring civil actions against perpetrators even when criminal charges are not filed. The GVA defines two of the four acts of “gender violence” - though the definitions are a bit convoluted: One or or more acts of violence of physical aggression satisfying the elements of battery under the laws of Illinois that are committed, at least in part, on the basis of a person’s sex; A physical intrusion or physical invasion of a sexual nature under coercive conditions satisfying the elements of battery under the laws of Illinois, whether or nor the act or acts resulted in criminal charges, prosecution or conviction. Under the Illinois Criminal Code, a person commits a battery when he or she knowingly, without legal justification, causes bodily harm or makes insulting/provoking physical contact with another individual. 720 ILCS 5/12-3. The Criminal Code requires physical contact. AND EMPLOYERS MAY NOW FACE LIABILITY In July, 2023 an amendment made it explicit that the GVA does extend to the workplace. As set forth in the Act, an employer is liable for gender-related violence in the workplace by an employee when the interaction arises out of and in the course of employment. Liability will only arise however, if the (1) the employee was directly performing his or her duties and the violence was the proximate cause of the injury or (2) while the agent of the employer was directly involved in the gender-related violence and the performance of the work was the proximate cause of the injury. Liability will only extend to the the employer however if it can be shown that (1) the employer failed to supervise, train or monitor the offending employee or 2) the employer failed to investigate and respond to reports directly provided to appropriate management personnel. Damages under the Act may include injunctive relief, and actual damages, damages for emotional distress and punitive damages. And importantly, the GVA is a fee-shifting statute - so a successful plaintiff may seek to recover attorneys fees. So, in cases of sexual harassment, may a plaintiff, include a count for damages under the GVA? The answer is an unqualified yes. And the contact need not be excessive or dramatic or prolonged - so long as there was no consent nor any justification for the physical contact. In fact, the Act notes that a legitimate threat that the harasser will commit an nonconsensual act is sufficient.
Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.