Bad Legal News for Lance Armstrong Team - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025
The hits just keep on coming for former all-American boy Lance Armstrong and his team. Back in 2004, Armstrong was America’s hero, riding his bike for the U.S. Postal team and winning the Tour de France. According to published reports, Armstrong’s salary in 2004 was $4.5 million. Yes, $4.5 million to ride that bike. And, his agreement provided that if he won the Tour de France every year from 2001 to 2004 he would be paid a $10 million dollar bonus. The agreement also provided that the U.S. Postal Team had to purchase insurance to cover those bonuses.

So the ownership of the U.S. Postal Team purchased insurance from an outfit called SCA Promotions, a Texas firm that protects the interests of team owners and sponsors. According to an article in the Wall Street Journal[written by Vanessa O’Connell] SCA covers “hole in one” insurance and athlete incentive clauses in most of the major sports.

But, SCA refused to give Armstrong $5 million in bonus monies, suspecting that he was cheating. Mr. Armstrong of course was appalled and sued SCA to collect his money. The case was arbitrated and Armstrong testified under oath that he did not dope. According to the transcript from his 2006 testimony, Lance testified that “I race the bike straight up and fair” – sounding very much like a hero in some old Western. SCA was concerned it would lose, so they paid $7.5 million to Armstrong. The settlement agreement said “No party may seek to challenge, appeal, or attempt to set aside” the settlement terms. Wonder who insisted on that particular language being inserted?????

Flash forward to 2012. Armstrong, was stripped of nearly all of his titles, including the Tour wins. And in 2013 he publicly acknowledged he had used performance-enhancing drugs when he was winning all those races.

SCA then sued Armstrong for fraud, demanding he repay them $12 million dollars – which is the money SCA paid him from 2002 to 2004. Armstrong refused, saying Texas law would not countenance re-opening the earlier settlement.

An arbitration panel agreed to hear the case. Today an final arbitration award was entered, ordering Armstrong and Tailwind Sports to pay SCA $10 million dollars. Armstrong’s lawyers called the award “unprecedented”. Lance of course, is very concerned about fairness and all that sort of thing.

Armstrong is also looking down the barrel of a False Claims Act lawsuit filed by former teammate Floyd Landis alleging Armstrong defrauded the U.S. Postal Service as a team sponsor.

“Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive….”[apologies to Walter Scott].

Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Movie poster for
September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.