Groundbreaking Verdict against Gun Shop in Milwaukee - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

A groundbreaking verdict was returned in a Wisconsin courtroom yesterday and gun shop owners had better take note. In the summer of 2009, Julius Burton paid Jacob Collins $40 to purchase a .40 caliber handgun from Badger Guns[“Badger” – pictured above] a gun shop located in suburban Milwaukee. Video of the purchase shows Burton pointing out the gun he wanted to Collins. Additionally, when Collins, the alleged purchaser, was filling out certain paperwork, he checked “No” to a question that inquired if he was the actual buyer. Donald Flora, the clerk working at Badger Guns, told him to change his response to “Yes”. The gun was purchased and promptly turned over to Burton. A month later, Milwaukee Police Officers Bryan Noberg and Graham Kunisch spotted Burton riding his bicycle on the sidewalk. The officers, while still in their squad car, instructed Burton to stop doing so, as riding a bicycle on a sidewalk is prohibited by a Milwaukee ordinance. Burton ignored them and continued riding on the sidewalk. The officers then exited their car and pursued Burton. He aggressively resisted, then pulled out the handgun and started shooting. Both officers were shot in the face. Officer Nordberg lost multiple teeth as a bullet crashed through his mouth and lodged in his shoulder. Officers Kunisch was shot multiple times. He lost an eye, and part of the frontal lobe of his brain. His wounds forced him to retire. The officers sued Badger, alleging that the store personnel were aware, or should have been aware that the gun was clearly being purchased illegally for someone who could not legally purchase the weapon. Badger’s attorneys argued that the clerk who oversaw the sale didn’t intentionally commit any crime. The jury found for the officers and awarded $1.5 million to Norberg and $3.6 milion to Kunisch. Additionally, the jury awarded punitive damages of $730,000. The verdict is believed to be the first of its kind for shooting victims. A 2005 law provides substantial immunities to gun dealers for these kinds of injuries. At least one presidential candidate – Hilary Clinton – has vowed to repeal that law if elected. Defense attorneys have vowed to appeal the verdict, and will likely be well funded by gun interests Milwaukee atuthorities claim that between 2006 and 2009 more than 1,800 guns purchased from Badger were used in crimes. Burton is currently serving an 80 year sentence. The link below shows video of portions of the purchase and confrontation prior to the shooting.

http://fox6now.com/2015/10/13/breaking-verdict-reached-in-badger-guns-civil-trial-jury-due-in-court-around-5-p-m/#ooid=QxZG82eDqyYkW1fyt5–MWc38BdeQu9P

Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Movie poster for
September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.