In Alabama the "Stand Your Ground Defense" is of no comfort to battered women. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

In the January issue of the New Yorker , Elizabeth Flock wrote this compelling article on Brittany Smith – a battered Alabama woman[pictured above] who shot and killed the man who had savagely attacked her. The article detailed how Smith, a young woman in her thirties, was finally feeling good about life in January of 2018. Smith had battled her share of demons. She had struggled with substance abuse and had lost custody of her three children. But in 2018 Smith had cleaned up and had landed a job paying a decent wage. She was confident that she would soon be getting increased visitation with her kids. Things were looking up.

On that day in January of 2018, she had gotten a call from an old friend – Todd Smith[no relation]. Todd bred pit bulls in Jasper, Tennessee, not that far from where Brittany lived. Brittany had been at Todd’s house the day before and had taken a puppy home with her. When Todd called that day he said he was stranded in a nearby park and needed a place to stay. Despite some misgivings – Brittany had previously rejected his advances – she agreed to pick him up. Brittany brought Todd to her house and not long after he arrived, Todd assaulted her. He choked her until she lost consciousness. When she was woke she was naked and Todd was sexually assaulting her. He beat her again until she again lost consciousness. Afterward, Todd told her that if she ever told anyone about what had occurred he would kill her and her family.

Brittany called her mother Ramona while Todd held the phone. Ramona thought something was wrong and sent Chris – Brittany’s brother – over to Brittany’s house. Todd, Brittany and Chris then drove to get cigarettes. The clerk at a local gas station who knew Brittany noticed her tangled hair, battered hands and scratched face. When he asked if she was ok, Brittany wrote “Todd Smith” on a piece of paper and said Todd had beaten and raped her. She asked him not to call the police however, as she was worried Todd would follow through on his threats to her family.

When Chris dropped Todd and Brittany off, Brittany communicated to her brother that he should return to the gas station. He did and learned what had happened to Brittany. Chris returned to the Brittany’s armed with a .22 caliber pistol. Chris confronted Todd in the house and told him to leave. Todd refused. Chris placed the gun on a counter and a fight ensued. Todd – who was previously ingested a combination of Xanax, amphetamines, meth and alcohol was soon choking Chris. Brittany grabbed the gun and shot Todd. The bullet had no impact. She fired two more rounds and then called 911.

Todd died a short time later. Brittany told the police he had beaten her and raped her and also assaulted Chris. The rape kit showed bruises on Brittany’s neck, breasts, arms, legs and pelvis. There were undeniable signs of attempted strangulation. There were bite marks on her chin and neck.

48 hours later, Brittany was charged with murder.

Initially, Brittany and Todd told police Todd had fired the gun. The reason? Because they thought, as do lots of people in Alabama, that a woman who defends herself against violence from a man doesn’t get a fair shake.

Todd’s assault of Brittany was hardly his first act of violence against a woman. He broke his ex-wife’s nose in the early 2000’s. Subsequently he broke her nose a second time, her ribs, and her jaw. He also repeated sexually assaulted her. He would be charged with domestic violence on five separate occasions. He continued beating his ex-wife even after they divorced. Todd was arrested approximately 80 times before he died.

Despite all that, in March, 2018, Brittany was indicted for Todd’s murder.

Brittany decided that she would assert the “Stand Your Ground” Defense – based on Alabama law which permits lethal force against a threat.

Last month, Flock wrote a follow up article detailing how an Alabama judge ruled that Brittany would not be allowed to assert the Stand Your Ground defense. The judge’s “reasoning” is difficult to comprehend and appears to ignore undisputed evidence of vicious assaults upon both Brittany and her brother. Testimony of Todd’s history of violence against women was stricken.

Although Brittany can seek to reverse the decision, that’s a longshot. The most likely scenario is that Brittany will be tried for murder.

By Mark Loftus February 17, 2026
German Conglomerate makes a bid to end Roundup litigation 
By Mark Loftus February 17, 2026
By Mark Loftus February 3, 2026
THE ILLINOIS GENDER VIOLENCE ACT - IN A NUTSHELL Under the Illinois Gender Violence Act (GVA) 740 IlCS 82/1, victims of sexual assault, domestic violence and other forms of gender related violence can bring civil actions against perpetrators even when criminal charges are not filed. The GVA defines two of the four acts of “gender violence” - though the definitions are a bit convoluted: One or or more acts of violence of physical aggression satisfying the elements of battery under the laws of Illinois that are committed, at least in part, on the basis of a person’s sex; A physical intrusion or physical invasion of a sexual nature under coercive conditions satisfying the elements of battery under the laws of Illinois, whether or nor the act or acts resulted in criminal charges, prosecution or conviction. Under the Illinois Criminal Code, a person commits a battery when he or she knowingly, without legal justification, causes bodily harm or makes insulting/provoking physical contact with another individual. 720 ILCS 5/12-3. The Criminal Code requires physical contact. AND EMPLOYERS MAY NOW FACE LIABILITY In July, 2023 an amendment made it explicit that the GVA does extend to the workplace. As set forth in the Act, an employer is liable for gender-related violence in the workplace by an employee when the interaction arises out of and in the course of employment. Liability will only arise however, if the (1) the employee was directly performing his or her duties and the violence was the proximate cause of the injury or (2) while the agent of the employer was directly involved in the gender-related violence and the performance of the work was the proximate cause of the injury. Liability will only extend to the the employer however if it can be shown that (1) the employer failed to supervise, train or monitor the offending employee or 2) the employer failed to investigate and respond to reports directly provided to appropriate management personnel. Damages under the Act may include injunctive relief, and actual damages, damages for emotional distress and punitive damages. And importantly, the GVA is a fee-shifting statute - so a successful plaintiff may seek to recover attorneys fees. So, in cases of sexual harassment, may a plaintiff, include a count for damages under the GVA? The answer is an unqualified yes. And the contact need not be excessive or dramatic or prolonged - so long as there was no consent nor any justification for the physical contact. In fact, the Act notes that a legitimate threat that the harasser will commit an nonconsensual act is sufficient.
Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.