SEX ABUSE CRISIS RAGES IN VERMONT - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

The story that just won’t go away.

Various news agencies carried stories on Friday about the Catholic priest sex abuse scandal that is currently rocking Vermont. In May, a jury heard allegations from a former Vermont altar boy that he was abused repeatedly by Rev. Edward Paquette in the 1970s. The jury awarded the plaintiff, now in his 40’s, $8.7 million dollars. The defendant, Fr. Paquette, had admitted in a 2006 deposition that he had been “sexually involved” with young boys at parishese in Indiana and Massachusetts before he applying for a position with the Burlington, Vermont Diocese in 1972. At the time, Fr. Paquette indicated he wanted to be closer to his parents, who lived in Massachusetts.
When Paquette applied for the Vermont position, Bishop Loe Pursley of the Fort Waye, Indiana Diocese advised Vermont Bishop John Marshall that Paquette had been accused of molesting young boys. Pursley further suggested that if the Vermont Diocese decided to take Paquette, he should be assigned to an institutional chaplaincy or a senior center, so he wouldn’t be around children. [Documents reflecting Pursley’s concerns were admitted as evidence in the trial] The Vermont Diocese however, elected to ignore that warning and assigned him to three parishes in Vermont. Paquette was subsequently accused of abusing children at each of those three parishes.
According to the victim in the recent trial, Paquette liked giving “pony rides” to the altar boys after mass. He would grope his young victims during the rides. The victim testified he was abused some 40-100 times. The victim had kept quiet for years, but decided to come forward after learning of Paquette’s history and the warnings from the Indiana Diocese.
Church officials have defended their handling of abuse claims in the 1970s by claiming that at the time, it was believed that prayer and counseling would cure priests of their attraction to little boys. It is not made clear who exactly thought that prayer would cure these perverts.
In another pathetic development, the Vermont Diocese is claiming that the verdict is covered by insurance…but they just can’t find the policy. No doubt they could find all kind of ancient documents damning divorce for example, but they misplaced the policy covering them for abusing children.
In yet another pathetic development, it was revealed that the Diocese had put each individual parish under charitable trusts two years ago, to shield them from what Bishop Salvatore Matano called “unbridled, unjust and terribly unreasonable assault.” So the Church has elected to blame not the twisted individuals who preyed upon children, but the persons who are now seeking recovery for years of abuse.
At least three additional lawsuits are scheduled to begin in August.

Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Movie poster for
September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.