Every 46 minutes another injury in a bouncy house. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

The internet was ablaze the other day with reports about a Journal of Pediatrics study showing a dramatic increase in the number of kids being hurt in those bouncy house things, pictured above. The number of kids injured jumped dramatically from 1995 to 2008. And the number of kids hurt doubled between 2008 and 2010. In 2010, 31 children per day were seen in Emergency Rooms for injuries that occurred in a bouncy house. That works out to about an injury every 46 minutes. And the explanation for the increasing injuries is pretty simple – it seems these things are now required at every birthday party, block party or barbecue.

In a finding that suprised absolutely no one, the study noted that boys are more likely to suffer concussions or closed head injuries. Having been around those contraptions quite a bit in the last few years, I’ve noticed that boys seem to be genetically programmed to run full-speed, directly at one another. And they all lead with their heads.

The most common mechanism of injury however, is falls. Less than 10% of the injuries are due to collisions. Only 3.4% of the kids injured needed to be hospitalized and 4 out of 5 of those kids had suffered fractures. Some of the articles had suggestions on how to make a bouncy house safer. The suggestions included:

1. Adequate adult supervision. Seems obvious but take a close look the next time you see one of these things being used. At a private event “supervision”, if it exists at all, occurs when Uncle Pat looks in on the kids on his way to get another beer. Even at school functions, the supervision is poor. Parents take shifts of 15-30 minutes. There is no continuity and one parent can’t control 20 screaming kids. It would be smarter to have 2-3 parents keeping an eye on things. One parent at the entrance, monitoring the kids as they enter and leave, and parents on the sides, doing what they can to monitor the madness inside.

2. Limit use to kids 6 years or older. That’s a start. Younger kids are very unsteady inside these things and particularly vulnerable if there are older kids flying around. Limiting access to kids of the same age/size would be even helpful as well.

3. Banning flips. Good idea. Kids doing flips are putting themselves, and other participants at risk.

4. Limit the number of kids inside. Another good idea. Have a monitor at the entrance actually count out the number of kids and then the door is shut and no one gets in for say, 10 minutes. Most kids are used to that kind of routine from school and will go along. And limiting the number of kids inside at a given time makes it easier for supervising adults to keep an eye on the activity inside.

Here is one parent who will NOT be disappointed when the fascination with these things comes to an end.

Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Movie poster for
September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.