Is there a link between brain cancer and major league baseball? - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

Is there a link between brain cancer and major league baseball? Some people are wondering, as Jere’ Longman’s recent article in the New York Times pointed out.

The Philadelphia Phillies played at Veterans Stadium from 1971 to 2003.

A number of Phillies who played at Veterans during those years have died of glioblastoma , a particularly deadly type of brain cancer. Since 2003, the following players died of glioblastoma:

-Tug McGraw, a reliever for the Phillies[age 59];

-Infielder John Vukovich[age 59];

-Catcher Johnny Oates[age 58].

Ken Brett, a pitcher, played at Veterans for only one season. He died at age 55. Some news accounts attributed his death to glioblastoma as well. And just a few weeks ago, Darren Daulton[pictured above] who led the Phillies to the World Series in 1993 passed away due to glioblastoma. He was 55.

When Daulton learned he had the disease in 2013, the Philadelphia Inquirer did an analysis of the 533 players who played for the Phillies while they played at Veterans. The analysis suggested that the cancer rate amongst those players was THREE TIMES the rate of the male population. Timothy Rebbeck, a Harvard cancer epidemiologist assisted with the study. He felt the elevated risk could have simply been chance. But he also noted that “It’s either random chance, bad luck or there is something there, but we just don’t have the science to pick it out yet.”

Longman’s article pointed out that researchers have been studying the cases for years – but at present say there isn’t sufficient evidence to state whether the string of deaths suggest some link to the stadium, or simply a tragic coincidence. Cancer clusters are very difficult to prove. “There is almost never an explanation for them,” noted Professor Rebbeck. But other players from that era are aware of the questions – and unnerved by them. Larry Bowa, who spent much of his career playing for the Phillies at Veterans noted that “I’m concerned about it. It raises your eyebrows, no question. It’s sort of scary.”

Larry Andersen, who pitched for the Phillies for several years during that ear noted that “You can’t help but think about it. It would be nice if there were some answers, if nothing else, for going forward. But nobody knows anything.”

In addition to the players noted above, number of other MLB players have succumbed to glioblastoma, all at relatively young ages. They include Hall of Fame catcher Gary Carter[57]; Bobby Murcer[62]; and Dan Quisenberry[45] . Manager Dick Howser[51] also died of the disease. Brett, Quisenberry and Howser all spent some time in Kansas City, where the ballpark had artificial turf, like the turf at Veterans. Some players have wondered whether the chemicals contained in they synthetic turf might be carcinogenic – but scientists say there is no data to support that claim.

It should also be noted that the NFL Philadelphia Eagles often practiced and played at Veterans on the same surface – but there is no data suggesting a high rate of brain cancer amongst those players.

Dr. Henry Friedman, a neuro-oncologist at Duke treated both McGraw and Carter. Friedman feels there simply isn’t enough data to draw any connection between the brain tumors and baseball. Melissa L. Bondy, a brain tumor epidemiologist at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston feels the high rate of brain cancer amongst Phillies players seems to be more than a coincidence but more research needs to be done.

Mickey Morandini, the Phillies’ first base coach played on the 1993 World Series team. He too wonders about the connection between cancer and baseball. But he noted that if it did turn out that the elevated cancer risk is more than mere coincidence – “I don’t know if I’d rather know or not.”

By Mark Loftus February 17, 2026
German Conglomerate makes a bid to end Roundup litigation 
By Mark Loftus February 17, 2026
By Mark Loftus February 3, 2026
THE ILLINOIS GENDER VIOLENCE ACT - IN A NUTSHELL Under the Illinois Gender Violence Act (GVA) 740 IlCS 82/1, victims of sexual assault, domestic violence and other forms of gender related violence can bring civil actions against perpetrators even when criminal charges are not filed. The GVA defines two of the four acts of “gender violence” - though the definitions are a bit convoluted: One or or more acts of violence of physical aggression satisfying the elements of battery under the laws of Illinois that are committed, at least in part, on the basis of a person’s sex; A physical intrusion or physical invasion of a sexual nature under coercive conditions satisfying the elements of battery under the laws of Illinois, whether or nor the act or acts resulted in criminal charges, prosecution or conviction. Under the Illinois Criminal Code, a person commits a battery when he or she knowingly, without legal justification, causes bodily harm or makes insulting/provoking physical contact with another individual. 720 ILCS 5/12-3. The Criminal Code requires physical contact. AND EMPLOYERS MAY NOW FACE LIABILITY In July, 2023 an amendment made it explicit that the GVA does extend to the workplace. As set forth in the Act, an employer is liable for gender-related violence in the workplace by an employee when the interaction arises out of and in the course of employment. Liability will only arise however, if the (1) the employee was directly performing his or her duties and the violence was the proximate cause of the injury or (2) while the agent of the employer was directly involved in the gender-related violence and the performance of the work was the proximate cause of the injury. Liability will only extend to the the employer however if it can be shown that (1) the employer failed to supervise, train or monitor the offending employee or 2) the employer failed to investigate and respond to reports directly provided to appropriate management personnel. Damages under the Act may include injunctive relief, and actual damages, damages for emotional distress and punitive damages. And importantly, the GVA is a fee-shifting statute - so a successful plaintiff may seek to recover attorneys fees. So, in cases of sexual harassment, may a plaintiff, include a count for damages under the GVA? The answer is an unqualified yes. And the contact need not be excessive or dramatic or prolonged - so long as there was no consent nor any justification for the physical contact. In fact, the Act notes that a legitimate threat that the harasser will commit an nonconsensual act is sufficient.
Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.