Second chance for woman injured at Weiner Circle - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

The Illinois Appellate Court recently resurrected a lawsuit against one of Chicago’s most famous late night stops – The Weiner Circle[pictured above]. Back in 2011, Leah Libolt was visiting Chicago. She and friend went out to dinner and then hit a few bars on the north side. And about at about 2 am, they found themselves at Weiner Circle.

Little background here…. Weiner Circle, by day, is a little hot dog stand on North Clark. But Weiner Circle stays open until 5 am. So all the millenials spilling out of the Lincoln Park bars head over for some grub to soak up the booze.

Years ago, according to interviews anyway, one of the owners grew tired of trying to communicate with an overserved customer so he began to verbally abuse him. A genre was born. Now when the bars close, people head over to Weiner Circle to “good naturedly” berate the people working there. And, the people working there give as good as they get. Lots of insults tossed back and forth, along with lots of profanity. Not for the faint of heart. It gets a little crazy, as the attached fan link demonstrates[the fan link is NOT associated with Weiner Circle].

Back to Ms. Libolt. When she arrived at Weiner Circle it was crowded, loud and rowdy. She waited in line to order and noticed an unidentified guy[“mystery man”] walking in and out of the restaurant. Libolt testified that the verbal sparring was mostly good-natured, but interactions between Weiner staff and mystery man were becoming aggressive. Mystery Man was repeatedly told to leave and one of the workers waved a large spoon at him. Mystery man left but then came back. And he was again loudly berated by other patrons and again told to leave. Shortly thereafter mystery man bumped into Libolt and knocked her down, causing serious injuries to her left arm. It is not entirely clear how mystery man ended upon bumping into Libolt. One of her friends admitted to pushing him when mystery man reached over him at the counter. [Mystery man was never identified].

Libolt sued Weiner Circle, claiming that it allowed the quarrelsome mystery man to remain in the restaurant, failed to control and/or remove him; encouraged employees to provoke patrons and was otherwise negligent. Weiner Circle filed a motion to have the suit tossed and the trial judge did just that. Libolt appealed.

The First District Appellate Court however, thought that the lawsuit should move forward. In a thoughful opinion, the court held that as Weiner Circle intentionally creates and knowingly maintains a violatile environment[with lots of drunk people yelling and being yelled at] the risk of injury is unreasonably high – and Weiner Circle has a duty to protect its patrons. To be clear, the opinion didn’t say all restaurants have that duty – only those that create and permit conditions like that in Weiner Circle late on weekend nights.

The opinion didn’t identify who represented Libolt, but kudos to them for sticking with the case.

Digital brain graphic with circuit board background, glowing blue, representing artificial intelligence.

The Anthropic Ruling - AI can't steal your content. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025
Topgolf building exterior with a gray facade, white sign, blue sky, and landscaping.

Topgolf hit with $15 million dollar verdict after 9 year old suffers devastating injuries. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025
Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.

Tesla Ignored $60 million settlement overture before getting crushed with $242 million dollar verdict. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Taco with ground meat, lettuce, tomatoes, cheese sauce, and onions in a crispy shell.

Appellate Court rebuffs same proximate cause argument twice in taco restaurant crash. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.

Supreme Court lets $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict stand against Johnson & Johnson - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Bar counter with beer taps, logos, and a pint of Guinness. Shelves filled with bottles in the background.

Trial Judge: criminal attack outside bar not foreseeable. The Illinois Appellate Court: not so fast.... - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025
Hand holding a black smartphone displaying the Uber app on a dark background.

Experts dispute victim numbers in Uber Sexual Assault Trial. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025
Spilled tan liquid with straw and debris on black asphalt with white line.

Surprise Headline - Federal Appeals Court sides with injured plaintiff in Costco Spilled Smoothie case. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025
Movie poster for

DuPont to pay $2 Billion to clean up "forever chemical" messes - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.
Four airline workers with luggage walking across an airport tarmac toward a setting sun.

Federal Judge tosses airline employees' lawsuit claiming uniforms caused illnesses. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025