Employees hurt at work - beware the FMLA designation. - Mark P. Loftus

September 26, 2025

The Family and Medical Leave Act[“FMLA”]is terrific legislation – and provides that under certain circumstances, an employee can take up to 12 weeks off per year[unpaid] without the threat of job loss. But when a worker gets hurt at work, sometimes employers use FMLA as a sword instead of a shield.

I see this quite a bit – an employee gets hurt at work and needs time off to recover. The employee then files a Workers’ Comp claim. The employer recognizes that the worker has a serious injury that would qualify him for FMLA and then designates the leave as FMLA leave – to run concurrently with time off under Workers’ Comp. Entirely legal. The FMLA designation though, places certain responsibilities upon the employee – in terms of medical certification and periodic reporting. And, if after 12 weeks leave the employee can’t perform her job because of physical limitation, FMLA does NOT require the employer to place her in a less demanding job. So some less scrupulous employers are delighted to place injured workers on FMLA leave – and when the worker can’t return in 12 weeks, they hire someone else and the employee is out of a job. And to make matters worse, some employers will then cut off Worker’s Comp benefits such as Temporary Total Disability[“TTD”] which are payments made to injured employees amounting to 66% of their weekly wage. Employees out due to injury need those payments to meet everyday household expense. To have them evaporate can be devastating.

The Illinois Supreme Court hasn’t dealt specifically with this issue, but the Interstate Scaffolding v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission decision seems to make it pretty clear that the above practices have no legal support. The Court ruled that the ONLY question to consider when determining if an employee gets TTD is if that employee remains unable to return to work as a result of a work-related injury. If that employee can’t return to work, that employee should get TTD – even if terminated due to some alleged FMLA infraction.

But some employers are not particularly impressed by Illinois Supreme Court decisions. They will still try to eliminate employees who have the nerve to file Worker’s Compensation claims. Lots of unsuspecting employees hurt at work have lost Worker’s Compensation benefits because their employers used FMLA to create murky reasons for the elimination of employees. Don’t let it happen to you.

Red Tesla sedan driving on a road.
September 26, 2025
According to online reports, Tesla ignored a $60 million dollar settlement overture in the wrongful death case that ultimately resulted in a $242 million dollar jury verdict against the car maker. The lawsuit grew out of 2019 crash where a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, plowed through a Florida intersection and crashed into a Chevy Tahoe. Neima Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo were standing near the Tahoe when the Tesla crashed into it. Leon was killed and Angulo suffered serious injuries. A lawsuit was filed against Tesla, asserting that although the Autopilot feature was engaged, the vehicle did not brake. Florida law permits a monetary demand to be issued before trial. If the defendant fails to accept the demand within 30 days it is considered rejected. If the plaintiff then goes to trial and secures a verdict 25% greater than the offer, the defendant is on the hook for plaintiff’s investigative expenses and attorneys’ fees. Tesla is appealing the jury verdict, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”.
Johnson's baby powder container, white bottle, blue text, red seal, 400g.
September 26, 2025
This important ruling got kind of lost in the news cycle. A couple weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court refused to vacate a $2.2 billion dollar ovarian cancer verdict against Johnson & Johnson[“J & J”]. The verdict was originally returned by a Missouri jury in 2018 on behalf of 22 women. The original verdict was actually $4.7 billion but a Missouri Appellate Court reduced the award to $2 billion. Each of the women claimed that there was asbestos and asbestos-laced talc in J & J talcum powder products they used, and they developed ovarian cancer as a result. Asbestos is known to cause cancer. Talc, in its raw form is often found in close proximity to naturally occurring asbestos. When J & J mined talc, that talc sometimes contained asbestos. And that asbestos sometimes found its way into J & J personal hygiene products. [In 2019, J & J recalled 33,000 bottles of J & J products after FDA testing found asbestos in test samples]. J & J, has known of the risk of asbestos contamination in talc products since the 1970’s. Some 21,000 plus ovarian cancer cases are pending against J & J throughout the United States.
Movie poster for
September 26, 2025
Reports today say that DuPont and the State of New Jersey have reached a $2 Billion dollar settlement arising out of DuPont’s release of “forever chemicals” into soil, wetlands and other areas in New Jersey – and then forgetting to clean up the mess they made. The settlement with DuPont is reportedly the largest environmental settlement ever obtained by a state. “Forever chemicals” – also known as PFAS(referring to per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are man-made chemicals that are used in an extensive variety of products as they are both water and grease-resistant. The chemicals are linked to litany of health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers(kidney, testicular and breast) liver damage, thyroid issues and reproductive problems(such as decreased fertility, low birthweight and developmental problems). NJ.Com is reporting that one of the sites where DuPont created munitions created such significant contamination in the environment that over 300 homes required filters to prevent toxic chemicals from seeping into their homes. The settlement terms provide that DuPont will spend $875 millions cleaning up the contamination and set aside another $125 million to cover other damages that may arise. Additionally, DuPont will also set p a $1.2 billion funding source and reserve fund of $475 million to ensure that even if the company fails to make payments, or goes bankrupt, public funds will not be used. For a stark introduction into the nature of PFAS, check out Dark Waters, a compelling and criminally underrated movie based on the decades old fight waged by attorney Robert Bilott against DuPont for contaminating West Virginia rural communities.